On Therapy as Social Control

I was reading an interesting article in the Medical Humanities journal, about use of psychological therapies to “help” unemployed people find work. The article, rightly in my view, points out that such therapies are on very dubious ethical ground.

There’s a view out there, which I think is utterly erroneous, that therapy and psychiatry can act as a remedy for all sorts of social ills. Give everyone enough CBT and fluoxetine, so the idea goes, and poverty, social inequality, abuse, bad housing etc will simply cease to be a problem. Does it work? Of course it doesn’t.

The article describes some “motivational” statements that were sent out to people on the Work Programme.

Go hard, or go home

My only limitations are the ones I set for myself

Failure is the path of least persistence

Success is getting up one more time than you fall down

It’s always too soon to quit

Unsurprisingly, those who received this responded with “anger, humiliation and depression” rather than being encouraged to get up and seek work. One can only imagine how such banal rubbish sounded to people who sent out multiple job applications at the height of the Credit Crunch, only to discover that nobody was hiring.

There’s other examples of such “therapy” being offered as a solution to problems in society. News reports have suggested that jihadists may be forced to undergo “deradicalisation” therapies. Although I agree that radical Islamism is a danger, the idea that people will give up their beliefs because a therapist told them to strikes me as naive in the extreme.

We’ve been here before. In the seven years I’ve worked in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services [insert usual disclaimer here about how views expressed are in a personal capacity and not necessarily those of my employer] I’ve seen the vogue come and go for anger management. Schools, voluntary services, youth offending services and CAMHS were all sending vulnerable, often traumatised kids to anger management, so they can learn how to control their “anger problem”.

I’ve been struck by how many young people benefited from this. Virtually none of them. If they did, it usually wasn’t for a reason to do with the actual model of therapy. Perhaps they developed a good relationship with the worker, and the anger management exercises were simply something to do while they got to know each other.

Part of the problem is how it’s framed as an “anger problem”. Of course, the problem isn’t really anger. Children aren’t sent to anger management because they kept writing indignant letters to their MP. The problem that everyone is concerned about is their behaviour – smashing up bus stops, getting into fights and so on. It’s what they do that gets them sent to anger management, not how they feel.

As for those feelings of anger, those are often rooted in a much wider systemic problem – they live in a bad part of town, they aren’t getting appropriate parental boundaries, in some cases they’re being abused or neglected. To simply say they have an “anger problem” is a reductionist, narrow explanation that ignores wider issues outside of their control. What they often need is nurture, care, compassion and stability, not a finger pointed at them saying that they’re the problem and they need to sort it out.

Mostly importantly, what all these therapies ignore, whether it’s mandatory CBT on the Work Programme, forced deradicalisation or anger management, are the issues of consent and a client-based approach. It ignores a basic and fundamental tenet of therapy – that it’s there to help the client do what they want to do, not what everyone else wants them to do. That’s what makes such therapies not only unethical, but ultimately ineffective.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “On Therapy as Social Control

  1. Thank you for this. I’m a counsellor working an employee assistance programme ‘supporting’ people in work to stay in work. However, that focus is never on my agenda and I always encourage people to consider their environment and whether it’s conducive to their wellbeing rather than continuing to individualise them in the assumption that the reason they are unhappy or anxious is because they are missing some sort of skill or have a flaw in their character.

    Managers honestly don’t get the irony of sending a referral to the organisation for an employee that is suffering from ‘work stress’ and it concerns me that people seem to genuinely believe that they should be better managing increased workloads, reductions in staffing and near-constant restructuring instead of challenging it.

    It appears from this that even those out of work are unable to escape the Self-help rhetoric, with its condescending bullshit and empty promises. This individualisation process sidelines any concept of embedding our distress in our environment. It interrupts thoughts of collaboration and revolt and labels genuine feelings of anger and resentment as an inability to cope and succeed (funny how people rarely question why we should ‘cope’ our way through life).

    Doing what I can from the realm of the working.

    In solidarity with fellow practitioners with a critical eye on our practice and with those in and out of work.

  2. Thanks for this Essential reading on #Unemployed neither Mad nor Bad – #CBT won’t Help x

  3. More government funded victim blaming. The reason there are so many people not working is because government policy has resulted in their being more unemployed people than there are jobs. Having people saying witless affirmations does not create jobs. It is not unemployed people’s fault that there are no jobs.

  4. Pingback: Thoughts – June 2015: Psychoanalysis, Psychology, Mindfulness, Sexuation… | Archives of a Divided Subject

  5. Check out the UKCP and BACP statements about this. They disapparove of the new scheme.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s